About Me

Name: Young Republican
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Around The Breakfast Table

                               Romance,Grandfather,Grandmother,Wife,Husband,Caucasian,Mature Adult,Senior Adult,60s,70s,60-65 Years,65-70 Years,Mature Women,Mature Men,Senior Men,Senior Women,Two People,Heterosexual Couple,Cheerful,Happiness,Couple,Love,Married,Vector,Illustration and Painting,Watercolor Painting


I'd like to introduce you to two of the most wonderful, the most wonderful in my opinion, people living today, my grandparents. My Grandmother is Dolores, who was a nurse for a few years before falling in love with a slightly older gentleman Melvin. They had three daughters, one of them, if you can deduce was my mother. My grandmother raised her daughters with love, femininity, charm and grace. She's one of those woman who while playing the perfect stereotype of a cookie making grandmother you can tell she is wise beyond words. When not helping out in Detroit at a homeless shelter, she's doing a million different things from volunteering everywhere, to her book and sewing club. My grandfather, a WWII veteran is a man of few words yet never, ever would you call him cold. He is the most loving, caring, smartest man I know. In a land full of boys masquerading as men, he is the pinnacle of which, all young men should hope to achieve. Besides being Dearborn, MI tennis champ, he is well known for his strength of doing push ups in his eighties, his mind is sharper than I could ever hope for, for fun he plays chess. He's the perfect blend of strength and brawn. He's 91 now, just slowing down a little, and still (this will sound like a rose colored exaggeration...trust me, it's not) does more and has more energy than the rest of the family combined. At 90, he was still chopping down trees. I so fortunate to have all four of my grandparents alive and while I love my other grandparents, our relationship is polite, respectful and distant; I'd prefer it that way.

 

If you've ever wondered where I got my political beliefs from, the closet one could guess in hindsight would be my grandparents. If I had to describe them, I'd call them Rockefeller Republicans. First of all, they aren't wealthy, or at least that's what I know. They have financially protected themselves and will never want for anything, but they aren't driven to extravagance. They've traveled all over the world and that was their luxury, that they still indulge in every few years or so.

 

I went over their house one morning, invited for the best breakfast ever, blueberry-bacon pancakes (in which fresh bacon is broken up into the batter of the pancake mix and it is the best thing you will ever taste which has to be accompanied by maple syrup bought on a trip up north). As always we discussed politics, they are self described "independents" but they really are Republicans. They voted together, never on purpose, on Eisenhower, Nixon, Goldwater, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush, Bush the second time, Dole and then 2000 happened. They like me are adamant McCain supporters, (although in the issue of full transparency, I supported Bush over McCain in 2000 believe a lie that he had fathered a black child and was pro-choice all lies feed to us by some very unethical people, although I don't believe Bush himself). After McCain lost, they supported Gore, a Democrat for the first time. In 2004, they wanted Lieberman (which in hindsight so would I, but I supported Bush. After Lieberman didn't get the nom., they voted for Kerry. Now in 2008 they favor McCain, Giuliani, although my grandfather chimed in he also was considering Hillary. They never vote or do anything in malice. They simply vote on the better of the two candidates. I'm learning to vote like them, but the stubborn Republican in me is fighting tooth and nail.

 

My grandparents don't believe in judgment as a rule. They believe in self judgment and more importantly the need for more love in this world of ours. They only offer compassion to anyone they meet. They are kind beyond words. I love them so much. Going back to their views they are environmentalist who took us and our cousins camping for years. They believe that nature is God's gift to us and we should protect it and it is our duty to do so. They are also large supporters of the public arts, with them taking me, their first grandchild :) and all subsequent, grandchildren to art museums, science museums, history museums, the symphony, plays the works. They've cultured me, made me appreciate the better things in life, like wine never beer, and old films rather than new, and I cannot thank them enough. They've never missed a week of church; they love God and believe in loving people at where they are at. When it comes to their knowledge of politics, they know everything, but they aren't political junkies. They read the morning paper, (another thing I love about them) and watch the evening news with Brian Williams. When I told them I was watching Katie Couric over at CBS, my grandmother wrinkled her nose and said "oh...herrrr."

 

If this whole piece reeks of sainthood, it should. They are living saints. You may disagree with them occasionally, I do often, but you will never find them disagreeable. They are filled with absolute humility which of of course only makes them more enduring. They would kill me (ok just love me more) if they found out I had written such a love letter about them. They'd tell you they weren't perfect about how Christ was the one and only to walk on Earth, clean without fault. They'd tell you about their faults which would only become attributes, like how my grandfather smoked leaving out the story about he quit the second my Aunt Pat (their first) was born. He never touched another cigarette for the rest of his life. They are my heroes, my purpose, and my belief in the ultimate good of people. If I can live a life a fraction as well as they have, I will die a most happy man. I know one day God will call his living angels home. I don't know what I'll do without them, but I'll be comforted by the memories, all good not one bad, I've shared with them. That isn't an accident or selective memory, it's simply being around people good to down to their core.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What To Expect

                       Hollywood,Film Industry,Vector,Illustration and Painting,Film Slate,Clapboard,Director\'s Chair,Megaphone,Movie Camera,Stage Light,Tripod


James Carville: "Alright y'all let's shoot this spot."

Grip: "SCHIP Ad, Take 1"


Narrator (strong James Earl Jones voice): In October 2007, President Bush and Congressman X voted against...

JC: Stop, I hate it. You're fired James Earl, I want a female, motherly-like narrator and a connection opener.


Grip: "SCHIP Ad, Take 2"


Narrator (female, motherly voice): We've all been there, your child is sick (sound- children's cough) and you're debating whether or not to take them to the hospital. But what if you don't have insurance?

 
(Dark music with appearing photos of ugly black and white photos)

 
"President Bush and Congressman X voted against insuring children, letting sick children across the nation in danger."
--------------------------------------------

Scene: Go to a woman sitting in a rocking chair with a picture of a child on mantel.

Woman: "I've been a Republican my whole life, but that was before Johnny got sick. He was coughing up a storm one night and we didn't have insurance. So I gave him some cold medicine and hope it'd hold him over to morning.

Narrator: But little Johnny never saw morning.

JC: "Have her cry."

Producer: "Don't worry they always do."

Woman: "I went to getting him up in the morning but he was... (uncontrollable tears) but he was gone. If we had insurance they could have saved his life, I just wish more than anything I would have gone, forgotten the huge bill that would have come, Johnny paid for it with his life.

Narrator: Congressman X along with President Bush voted against insuring Johnny a bill that would have cost "X number of dollars" about what we spend in
Iraq every "X number of days."

JC: "Putting somethin' else about Bush at the end."

Narrator: Congressman X, President Bush's biggest ally. But where is he for our children.

Fast Disclaimer: Paid for by the Democratic Alliance Forum

JC: "Sometimes it's just so easy, I wonder why the hell y'all needed me. There’s a time to put politics over principles and principles over politics, good for me those Rs can’t tell the difference. I'm going home to Mary; we'll shoot for congresswoman Y tomorrow."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our "Bobby"

                         Bobby Jindal on the campaign trail

Every once in a while in this political world of dreary candidates and politicians, one emerges that steps out from the normal and truly electrifies, usually in the body of a young politician. RFK was one, sadly Barack Obama is another, and now we have one in our own party that declares itself Old in the title of GOP. I'm speaking of Bobby Jindal, governor-elect to the great state of
Louisiana. Jindal, just 36, was elected Saturday, and has more experience than it seems every Democratic candidate for President.

Jindal graduate of
Brown University and Oxford, as a Rhodes Scholar, has educational credentials that leave nothing to be desired. Jindal converted from Hinduism to Catholicism as a teenager (isn't it usually the other way around?). Louisiana governor Murphy J. Foster, Jr. appointed Jindal at age 24 to be Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals, which fiscally represented 40% of the state's budget. 2 years later he became Executive Director of the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare. He also served as President of University of Louisiana System. President Bush appointed him assistant Secretary of Health of Human Services for Planning and Evaluation.

In 2003, Jindal ran for Governor of Louisiana against Kathleen "it's all Bush's fault" Blanco. Blanco ran one of the dirtiest campaigns, if not the worse, ever. Her campaign staff actually colored Jindal skin, he's Indian-American, and colored it darker to make him appear more foreign and turn off white voters. Yes you read that right. In the end she eked out a victory with 52%, thanks to people like David Duke.

Jindal than became then became the 2nd only Indian-American to serve in congress, and the only one to currently serve. While he was setting
Washington ablaze, Blanco was trying to do everything possible to ruin Louisiana as fast as possible. Her leadership during Hurricane Katrina became completely non-existent, and she remains the highest example of absolute incompetence. She was so shamed; she conceded her possible re-election to Jindal earlier this year.

Calling Bobby Jindal smart, just feels like a bland description when describing a man of his intellectual caliber. He is obviously intelligent beyond words. But he's already showen, during Katrina, more leadership than every single Democrat in the state combined. While Ray Nagin was off in Willy Wonka's factory saying his city was meant for "chocolates only" and Kathleen Blanco was counting the days before she could escape the Governors mansion, Jindal stepped up and voters rewarded him and truly themselves this past weekend. 

It's obvious he's not only a candidate to watch in the future but demand. Unlike Barack Obama, who is doing a hideous reinterpretation of Mr. Smith Goes to
Washington ("Senator, you are no Jimmy Stewart") and RFK who was off in that special world that is the Kennedys, Jindal has above all humility, something lacking in the other two. Louisiana first, Washington next.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Last Thoughts Of Bathroom-Gate

                      “Historical reviewability akin to a public restroom” describes traditional encyclopedias, not CBPP ones like Wikipedia

With that special, senior senator from Idaho now staying until January 2009, we can hopefully say with all certainty that this national scandal is now over (please, please God). However I thought I'd add some last thoughts that come to me know.


-The ACLU while wrong about a lot of things was right that it is constitutional protected speech to ask for consequential sex without the exchange of money. It is illegal to have sex in a public place but it is not illegal to ask for it.

-Which brings me to thought number two, most people already do this. It's called going to the bar. The world will be a better place when we stop looking for meaningless sex and start pushing for true intimacy (in every sense of the word) between two people regardless of their sexual orientation.

-Arlen Spector is a great man. When every single Republican turned on Craig in his hour of need, Spector was their with open arms as he said "He's my friend, case closed". Do I hear Spector for President?

-Mitt Romney is "disgusting". All sin is equal in the eyes of the lord. Maybe Mormons do have another faith, because Romney would do well to learn about true Christianity.

-This is a scandal only because the Washington Press Corp. got a hold of it. For every Craig and Haggard out there, there are loads of other transgressions, far worse, that will never see the light of day. That's the true "scandal".

-How horrible this whole event was for Craig's wife Suzanne. I wouldn't wish it on my worse enemy let alone this kind woman. My prayers go out to her and the family.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (37) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Politics Of Sin

I love a good pen and the only sad thing about this adoration of an inanimate object, is the fact that pens A.) dry up and B.) have ink that can go everywhere. Such was the experience when in a Saturday morning class my pen exploded leaving my hands black and my face red. I'm a pro-klutz so without anyone noticing (I hope), I quietly slipped out the back to the bathroom. I started washing my hands right away, scrubbing with hot water and soap by the gallon. After five minutes, the majority of the ink was gone and just a little bit of my skin was covered black. I scrubbed for another five minutes and got rid of almost all the coloring (I'm not OCD). Then I realized something, my hands were clean and while they weren't porcelain white as usual (the joys of British relatives) they were without germs, at least as much as is possible. To some they may be classified as dirty and unclean but ten minutes of scrubbed hands are as clean as can be. The problem was with the visible black and the unfair classification that followed it. My hands were clean and compared against those people who don't wash their hands in the bathroom (yuck) you could have operated with them. Yet if you ask the average person whose hands are cleaner, they would reply Mr. I'm too good for soap’s were.
                       
I'm sure you can see the metaphor coming but bear with me. All too often we as Christians tend to label and make moral judgments that tend to be as far off as possible. I'm sure we all have our stories one of mine involved a church that wouldn't allow my mother on praise team because she was divorced (an event I thank Jesus for every day...the divorce I mean) while letting a man and his wife sing who had one of the dirtiest divorces ever (Paul McCarthy and Heather Mills have nothing on them) and yes their marriage was horrible for years. What was the problem with my mother? She had visible sin. We all have a million stories that would mirror the point.

What's so preposterous about this mindset that is prevalent in our churches, homes, and especially the Republican Party is that it goes against every facet of Christianity imaginable. The Bible clearly says that "we have all fallen short of the glory of God", "that all sin is equal in the eyes of the Lord" and that "he, who has not sinned, should throw the first stone". So why do we have certain people wanting to shame other people over there supposed sin.

Swear? You're equal to a murder.

Wish ill on someone? You're equal to a homosexual.

Haven't forgiven someone? You and O.J. are on the same moral level.

The Bible is very clear on this, we all sin daily but we are all forgiven by Christ's blood. Allowing human beings to judge one another is so irresponsible it's like putting Brittany Spears in charge of the keys to the liquor cabinet. To base political policy on this system is insanity. To not allow gay marriage is not morality but simply false selection made to prevent true introspection and repentance. The same goes for a number of prohibtion ways of political thought. It cames down to the cardinal rule that we in a government should not interfere with someone's free will as long as their actions do not infringe on another person's right. For those who would argue that this is moral relativism, they are right. All sin is equal, we are all sinner, and no sin is worse than the other, God has made it clear all sin is relative. We will all be judged, all of our sins equalized in front of the creator. The absolute faction of judgment is pride, something that is clearly not one of God's favorite attributes. God loves us all very dearly and he made us knowing we would sin. He holds us all on the same level, something that can get the prodigal son’s brother inside of us angry, and it is hard to apply harsh rules to one’s own life and get the same treatment as someone who it seems has nothing governing their life. But as my most conservative pastor, and you know I’ve had a lot, said to our congregation “saying one human is better than another, one sin is worse than another sin, is false right down to it’s core”.

Living a life on the straight and narrow without failure is impossible, living life with an intellectual realization that we are unworthy to judge isn't.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin Receives National Attention

I'm involved ever so slightly with a movement to bring attention to Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin in the hope of the Republican nominee putting her on the ticket. We, Palin fans, are not unlike Ron Paul supporters on proper medication and are able to realize the limits and benefits of an internet movement of any sort.

So I went around to the regular Pro-Palin sites and realized I could finally out-scoop them because of the benefit of having a completely non-existent night life. I'm a twenty years old who unfortuneatly to some friend's chagrin abides by the must be 21 to drink rule and think a good night is better spent with Charlie Rose than listening to some god forsaken loud music that takes three Tylenol to recover from. 

                                         

So I turned on Charlie Rose and found my favorite governor (when you have the worse in the nation, you have to look elsewhere) on the television. Charlie Rose gave national attention to Sarah Palin as he interviewed her and Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano (on the VP shortlist for the Dems.) about 08, their states and their lives.


Governor Palin said "education is a state's highest priority" "health care is a huge issue, we need to change" and stressed again and again "the need to stop being reliant of foreign sources of oil". For those who are federalists, she talked strongly about "the need to protect state's rights" the need to drill in the ANWR but only "safely and cleanly and it must be done right". When she refused to back the Steven's bridge to no where she said "we need to make sensible, wise decisions".
Palin showed how much she is in touch with the average American when she said the 08 election would be determined by national security. Palin has much invested in the War on Terror with a son now in boot camp getting ready to serve his country. She said that being commander of a national guard was the biggest reasonability a governor has "one that I cherish". About 08 "I want the best person elected" and "we must have a commitment to ethics reform".

 
Sarah Palin is the most popular public official serving today with approval ratings anywhere from the mid 80s to low 90s. Personally being a younger voter, I want to see a woman finally elected to a high office, one who isn't Nancy Pelosi. The 2008 election will be one of change, and in my mind, we will finally have our first female or African American president or vice president, regardless of which party wins. I really cannot see the Republicans being stupid enough to put two white men on the ticket. On the list of possible female VP nominees, Palin is clearly tops.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Meet Your New Senators

With Democrats slobbering over their 2008 presidential prospects, like Michael Moore at an all you can eat buffet, their enthusiasm is misplaced. The 2008 presidential race will be very much competitive, and against Hillary or Obama, to confirm Democratic doubt, Republicans could very well win. However in 2008 our congressional numbers will drop, particularly in the Senate where Democrats will gain at least three seats in the best case scenario for Republicans. They could grow much higher, let's look at the data.

These Are the Three Races we’ve Already Lost

                                  
Colorado- Colorado has gone under an amazing transformation from Red to Blue within the last few years. It now has a Democratic governor, senator. Bob Schaffer, as of now the Republican nominee is far too the right to win against the amazing Colorado
Democratic machine.

                             
Virginia- At first I had high hope for Tom Davis, (who will get my support if he runs), but with wealthy, popular Mark Warner in the race, Davis will be wise to stay in the house of reps. Warner will win and Virginia a once solid Red state will turn a darker shade of blue.

                                        Jeanne Shaheen
New Hampshire- John Sununu is the only incumbent doomed from the start and would be wise to just retire with dignity. Jeanne Shaheen will be
New Hampshire's next senator, no matter what. New England is very against the war and with the granite state losing both congressional house seats in 06, a high number of people, particularly independents are voting straight ticket Democratic.
 
                               The Retiring Senators

                                     

With the retiring senators Wayne Allard, Larry Craig, Pete Domenici, Chuck Hagel, John Warner and the death of Craig Thomas all seats will be competitive. 

As already stated Allard's and Warner's seats are already lost.

In solid Red states like Craig (Idaho) and Thomas (Wyoming) the Republican will win but money will have to spent and a lot of it. No matter what the state, the first electoral race will always be the most difficult.

Hagel (Nebraska
) and Domenici (New Mexico
) state's lean red; they could go left due to an unpopular president and the right centrist nominee.
Tortoise and the Hare
Unpopular Incumbents

No one expected Jim Talent to lose in 2005 but the race against him and Claire McCaskill grew and grew and he lost. A lot of Republican Senator's were not elected with high numbers and a race could grow in some very Democratic leaning soil.

Lamar Alexander elected with only 54% in a "red" state. Bob Corker was only elected with 50% against my favorite Dem. in 06 Harold Ford Jr.  He will probably survive because Dems. have such good prospects in 08.

Saxby Chambliss who ran a nasty campaign against Max Cleland and only managed a 53% win in a very solid conservative state. Again he will probably survive due to Democratic fortune.

Norm Coleman- Yes the Al Franken Race, if Franken doesn't get the nom. expect Coleman to lose. With the nom. it's competitive but still in our favor, Coleman only got 49.53% in 2002.

John Cornyn- Consider if you believe the word in Washington to be the biggest fill in the blank _______ in the senate just like Phil Graham during his term. However he is personally unpopular in
Texas
and received 55% in 2002.

Elizabeth Dole- Love the Doles, and she's a good fit for
North Carolina
but it's turning a blue. She won with 54% in 2002, with the right nominee it could get interesting.

Lindsey Graham- In solid red
South Carolina
he received only 54%. He could face the toughest primary challenge but if he survives he'll also have to run against a Dem. who could win if a third party (ship em' all back) candidate steals enough votes.

                                   
                                         Scandals Sell
 
Larry Craig, Ted Stevens, Pete Domenici along with David Vitter who is not running in 08 were all effected by some sort of scandal, rightly or wrongly. It’s adds an unwelcome aura to the party as scandal tarnished. It killed Conrad Black in Montana and could kill the party in 08.

                                                     The RINOs 

                                          

Being that I'm a "RINO", I love my fellow RINOs to death but the Dems. know that their best 08 prospects lie in blue states with moderate Rs.

Susan Collins- Identified as a target candidate, she's personally popular and wonderful but fear of another Lincoln Chaffe (we like everything about you except the letter next to your name) could happen. With 58% in 02, I have great hope Maine
will continue to be represented by her.

Gordon Smith-
Oregon
is very blue and Smith may take the fall. He received only 56% of the vote in 2002 and could go down in 08. However he has done a lot of good and distance himself well from the President.

John Sununu- He will lose as previously stated.

                                   
                                  Strong Democrats

Max Baucus (63%), Joe Biden (58%), Dick Durbin (60%), John Kerry (81%), Carl Levin (61%), Jack Reed (78%), John Rockefeller (63%) races are won from the start and aren't worth competing in.         

                             Mistaken Weak Democrats
                                

Tom Harkin, Tim Johnson, Mary Landrieu, Frank Lautenberg, and Mark Pryor are all potential competitive, only in the sense of a mirage. All with the exception of Pryor will be re-elected; Pryor will most likely lose if Mike Huckabee chooses to challenge him in the event he does not get the nomination.

                           Republicans Who Will Win
                                

On the positive, some Republicans will win in 08 such as Thad Cochran of Mississippi, Michael Enzi of Wyoming, James Inhofe, Mitch McConnell, Pat Roberts, and sadly Jeff Sessions. Inhofe and Sessions could and that's a very big could possible face some tough competition but very doubtful.

The Numbers Game

Out of the 33 seats up for play in the Senate in 2008, 22 are Republican and only 11 are Democrat. The numbers are clearly in Democratic advantage.

So sadly Republicans will not recapture the Senate in 2008, they'll be lucky to avoid an absolute avalanche of Democratic wins.

                                
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 2008 Michigan-Iowa War

The 2008 election is a revolution against the fascist forces ruling us. I'm speaking of course, of Iowa and New Hampshire. With their absolute hold on the primary process, Iowa and New Hampshire are being challenged like never before a multitude of states. Michigan is most active in fighting the ruling states, and paying for it dearly. While of course no one believes either party will refuse their delegates in the convention, (many in the state could care less) it is shocking to see how far the major candidates are willing to bow down to the Tall Corn and Granite State. When all the Democratic candidates signed a loyalty pledge to not campaign in Michigan, it was interesting to see how fast they would cower to McCarthy-like tactics. But they managed to exceed expectations of idiocy, as Democrats so often do, when five including Barack Obama and John Edwards took their name of the January 15th ballot. 
                                    
My two hometown papers, the liberal Detroit Free Press and conservative Detroit News were outraged. "Madness" cried the DFP, "Big Mistake" said the News. Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and Governor Jennifer Granholm, liberals both, talked of withheld endorsements and Kilpatrick...gasp...talked of giving the Republicans a fair chance. Hillary Clinton with her consistently flawless campaign will stay on the ballot and is the only Democrat who can still win the Great Lake State. Our primary process is full of flaws, but our constant allowance of Iowa and New Hampshire electoral superiority must end. Everyone agrees that we should either go to a lottery of sorts or to do a rotating regional primary, and hopefully through the Michigan revolt there will finally be the energy needed to make such plan a reality. Michigan deserves to go first no more than Iowa and New Hampshire or any of the other 47 states; the difference is Michigan realizes it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Red & Blue Television

You often hear about how the entertainment culture is sending us liberal shows of every stripe imaginable. It simply is not true. Being that Republicans make up presumably 50% of their audience media executives want to fill the market for entertainment. I took it upon my self to analyze some of the shows on television today and found many of the most popular shows for conservatives are actually liberal and vice versa.


The Top Three Republican (Conservative) Shows

                                               
How I Met Your Mother- I was lost on to why everyone liked "Friends" in the 90s, but this is the show "Friends" could have been. The best comedy on television, it's about a young twenty something guy named Ted looking for his future wife and wanting fidelity. He is accompanied by his best friends, who make the best young cast on TV today.

                                             
Desperate Housewives- For a party full of Gladys Kravitzs; DH fills the unhealthy obsession we seem to have with our neighbors' personal lives. No doubt most of red
America loves DH since it's from Republican creator Marc Cherry. And who can't love the best Republican ever on television, Bree Van DeCamp.

                                              
The New Adventures of Old Christine- Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays the lovable, lazy and very liberal Christine. Christine regularly says things like "Ok, I may have never voted. The line was too long but I wore an "I Voted" sticker and shamed others into voting". Another great example of liberal lunacy involved Christine trying to implement affirmative action in her son's private school and getting bigoted people in by mistake.

 

The Top Three Democratic (Liberal) Shows

 
                                                   
24- Let's see...an idealistic and moralistic Democratic black president who has absolutely no vice faces after an attack on US soil, and a decision to go to war. He is given false information fed to him by a corporation that wants to profit from the war and actually help plan the attack. Could this show be any more Obama loving or Bush hating.

                                               
Two & A Half Men- Shows how a lot of children are raised by adults who are childish to their core. The worse parents ever father Alan and Uncle Charlie teach 10 year Jake to gamble, sexual positions, and to rot in front of the television. If those of us who are liberal can't make a case for gay adoption out of this show, we deserve to lose.

                                               
The Office- The show while hysterical is a result of an out of control boss assaulting every PC concept available and making America happy they exist. Side note: Am I the only one who sees Michael Scott as the most closeted man in
America?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Draft Scott Pelly

One can't help but notice the recent trend in reporters who have just stopped pretending to be un-bias. While just a few months ago, I would have put NBC's David Gregory on the top of the list; he has recently been eclipsed by 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelly. In just three reports, Pelly managed to aggravate me more than Gregory has all year. In a recent piece of about Tennessee Titan's quarterback Vince Young, Pelly was more than happy to play the "he came from the streets" angle. Bonus points to CBS though for not putting yet another black reporter on a story about black people. White people speak their language to... at least that's the word on the street. Young pretending to brush away a tear talked about his father not being there for him and in classic cool black fashion managed a sentence of "I ain't got nothing to be ashamed about” or something or other. Note to young fatherless black men- you may not have had a father but I presume you had an English teacher. Digressing, Pelly in usual fashion asked easy questions in a tough tone. Imagine Walter Cronkite harshly questioning "Did you really have that for breakfast, Mr. President?" and you get the style of his reporting. That could easily be seen in his recent interview with Iranian terrorist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After his cooing remarks about how eloquent Ahmadinejad he reminded me of a parent with the biggest brat in elementary school "oh he's not that bad and he has so many good qualities" and his interview showed it. However the cherry on top was revealed in a rerun of his interview with one of the men involved in the Haditha incident. At one point when asking if the man would do anything differently and the solider said, "I would respond to the situation the same if my knowledge was the same as it was when the incident took place". Pelly actually said "Oh you can't mean that!" Echoing the Grey's Anatomy doctors- "Seriously?" Pelly who's interviewing style is a mixture of superficiality, condescension (only with US troops never say with a murderous nut who denies the Holocaust), and fake emotion is more than I can take. His attack and all knowing attitude when dealing with men who saw their most beloved comrade die in pieces is made all the more worse by the knowledge that Pelly never served a day in uniform. Perhaps before smearing our soldiers, Pelly might want to see how he would react in the same conditions. The solution lies in a military draft for one.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Paula Deen's Recipe for Disaster

Paula DeenHi y'all, I'm Paula Deen and I don't know about y'all but I've been thinking about this whole election thing comin' on up and I said to myself "Paula, don't you have a recipe for the perfect candidate?" And you know what y'all I found it so today I'm gonna teach ya how to make it.Now this recipe is called a Mitt Romney soufflé. And let me tell you, girls, yum! He's so darn good lookin’; I don't even need butter to make him the perfect dish.

Now these are the ingredients y'all are gonna need:

 
Flip-Flops- May cause your batter to lose consistency but needed to add that crunchy taste. I'm crazy about it!

Homophobia- Now I know what y'all are thinking. Didn't this recipe call for "more gay rights than Teddy Kennedy" just a few years ago? Apparently it was recalled so this will make a fine substitute.

Business Record- It adds to the richness of the batter, but be warned of the aftertaste of workers who have lost their jobs.

Massachusetts- Awful good state and I'm sure all good folk, but they did give us the Teddy Kennedy on the rocks drink and the widow-winning Kerry Ketchup so their taste are questionable.

Abortion- Now while this may again taste like a flip-flop, realize it was just magically converted right around this here election.

6 sticks of butter- Hell, what'd y'all expect? I'm Paula Deen.


Now cook until the next election, but be warned occasionally a problem may occur with a part of the soufflé called a Larry Craig. All ya have to do is throw him under a bus and call him disgusting (Do not, I repeat, do not do this to David Vitter)) add a sprinkle more of homophobia. Crisis averted!
After taking office, the soufflé will look great, but it has a tendency of collapsing as soufflés do, because at the end of the day he has nothing of substance to hold it up. Thank y'all and until the next time, from my kitchen to your ballot, I wish you best dishes. And after four years of forcing Mitt Romney down your throat, y'all are gonna need it. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »