About Me

Name: Young Democrat
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Darkness In California

 

                                        

We'll soon hear the Supreme Court's decision about Proposal 8, the amendment that passed last November restricting basic human rights from our fellow citizens. It was sad to see a state considered to be so progressive, turn out to have so many bigoted people often low income, less educated minorities. It's been common practice, that once one group gets accepted by the mainstream of society, it turns against another fellow minority group.

As someone who is so close to so many members of the gay community, it pains me to see the hatred and vitriol thrown at them. The only thing that keeps me sane when hearing and seeing such bigotry is knowing that one day, sooner rather than later, we will look back at this moment in time as the embarrassing contretemps it is. Replace the word gay when discussing any civil rights issue with African American, Latino, Japanese or Chinese and we wouldn’t even be having this conversation.

I had a debate with my political science professor a few years ago in which we argued over the role of the judiciary over direct democracy as what happened in California. I argued for direct democracy, she for the judiciary. But in hindsight, I agree with her, that the protection of minority groups can not be left up to the electorate. We may say that America is the beacon of light and equality for all but in reality hatred is still all too common particularly in certain areas. David Duke would have been the governor of Louisiana in the 90s if only white people had been allowed to vote. Over in certain southern states, white supremacists candidates still get hundreds or a few thousand votes. You can go to certain places in Alabama or Mississippi and still hear words that make any sane person cringe, even up here in metro-Detroit, Michigan, I still hear and see many things that tell me the bigotry is a perennial evil that must be fought at all costs.

I'm hopeful, although not confident, that the California Supreme Court will overturn Prop. 8 for the evil and unconstitutional force it is. But if not it will go down as the Dred Scott case before it and that makes me feel just a little bit better.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Truly "Mad Men"

         mad-men

Over the last month, I've been writing about the American economy not in terms of how the system screwed up so badly but rather the business culture over the last two decades which we are finally paying for. Outsourcing, moving to states with lower wages and worker's rights, cutting wages/benefits/retirement plans. All of this is contributing to America's race to the bottom so that every one will pay their employees less and less making their product or service more competitive in the market. Technology has also been a huge factor in all of this, with more and more jobs not having to be done by humans at all, it's America's dirty little secret that many jobs being done by Americans today are not necessary. Yet, more companies are firing employees and using technology to enhance the bottom line.

Yet there is a last bit of American business culture that we still must discuss and that is the now adversial position between management/executives and the companies well being. Surly, employee wage cuts eventually hurt the company but it is rather how executives look at the companies that they run that is the biggest problem. From the financial cornerstones of AIG and Merrill Lynch to companies like Home Depot, executives no longer look at how to help their company but rather how to help themselves. Don't mistake this simply as populism paranoia. While many executives particularly if it's a family business want the business to succeed others only stay on for a year or two and during that time are locked into contracts that make the incentive to perform next to nil. In fact such lush contracts like those given to AIG weren't even for performance based pay merit but rather just a retention bonus. Meaning that just staying at the company or being dismissed on the company’s prerogative is enough to earn such a bonus. The people awarding these contracts were the same people receiving them. Yet all of this is not just legal it's the way that business has been performed over the last two decades.

In America, executives use to find a place to work and did so for the next thirty years as depicted in AMC's "Mad Men", yet now in the business climate they only stay on for a few years whether or not they do well at their job. Executives either leave for more money at another business or are removed from their position usually soon finding another. And every time, they do leave under less than favorable circumstances, they often get the amount owed to them on their contract in full. This culture has caused many institutions to fail most particularly in the financial services division. We can change this by requiring that more compensation be locked into company stock and stronger selling regulation on said stocks. Until we do such, this culture will continue to damage the American economy in ways we might not be able to repair.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ford Model

                                                
 
While the major economic crisis we are dealing with as a country right now is the freezing of th credit market due to the bank's poor liquidity and poor asset value, the story really getting lost is the fact that many companies are using the credit crisis as an excuse to reap all the benafits of the American economy without any of the costs.
 
   When looking at the huge economic boom during the 20th century, the strongest factor in all of it, was the Ford economic model. He thought that by paying his employees more than they were worth, he would make them fiscally solid and by extention (not to mention most important) customers. The bottom line that Ford saw was that by not trying to exploit his workers he actually helped his company by making sure more product would be sold.
 
   It was brillant, brave and really the model for the best of the business world. Helping your employees and your bottom line and the same time. Yet, those days are over. Now, we look at employees as a burden rather than a help. The realtionship between employee and employer has never been so contentious. Certainly exceptions remain but the realtionship between boss and worker is more adversial than friendly.
 
   Because of our "free markets" even a good employer as the Big Three and many more companies as well, can be impossible. In fact Toyota, Honda and all have made their product more competively priced because they pay their employees less, don't give them adequate health care, and have horrible retirement plans. Not to mention they are "at will" non-union employees meanining they can lose their job at any time for any or no reason at all. Then the public buys the cheaper car. That in turns hurts the companies that pay their employees well. Then you hear from the business community, politicos and the general public to lower wages, benefits and retirement plans in order to stay in business.
 
   Anybody can see that eventually Ford, GM, Chrysler have done all of that and will probably have to do more. Yet, lost in all this talk is the fact that by lowering the worker's standard of living they are less likely to be able to buy A.) the product they make but also B.) the product/service offered by the chattering class. And while I've focused on the automobile industry the same old song is being played across the country in every industry be it production or service.
 
   And while everybody's yelling and pointing to the basic economic math that, yes, you can make a product or provide a service for less money, you also make sure the standard of living across this country goes down and down and down. It's a race to see who can truly win this country's race to the bottom.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Race You To The Bottom

                             Stock Photo titled: Triathletes Running Down Steep Hill (2), USE OF THIS IMAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED
 

We are told of the many causes of this financial crisis, many blaming the Republicans, many blaming the Democrats... mortgage backed securities and a gluteness American lifestyle. There's plenty of blame to go around but in fact we are now paying for a business cultural norm over the last three decades, the race to the bottom of employee pay.

   The American workplace has never been in a more precarious position than today under the threat of three major factors that tie into one another, globalization, the advancement of technology, and the lowering of wages to remain competitive. And to state the obvious, employee pay is the blood that flows in the American economy. These three factors are killing the American workforce, spreading a virus of economic death from one victim to another.

   Now I don't agree with Pat Buchanan and Phyllis Schafley that we need protectism but unfettered trade is equally as bad. Globalization in relation to product is good, products made in America can be sold in China and things made in China can be sold in America (just one specific example) by allowing global product trade we get more products to choose from and even more important more customers to buy our product. But when we allow American companies to move from our country and build factories elsewhere, we in fact lower the wages of all Americans.

   A recent article caught my eye regarding a company called Rowe International that makes jukeboxes (http://www.roweinternational.com/) who announced last week they were moving from Grand Rapids, Michigan to Mexico and sadly not just for spring break. Many southern states have operated under the economic impression that lower wages and non-unionization would make them an appealing place to do business. And it did for a while but in the race to the bottom of wages, if you are leaving Michigan where you pay $20 an hour why go to Alabama to pay $12 when you can go to Mexico and pay $3. It makes no sense, not just that but you don't have American labor laws or safety "regulations".

The tie between globalization and the lowering of American wages is unquestionable intertwined. And while I've only talked about manufacturing of product, customer service has been outsourced as well. And it would seem to reason many other jobs would follow as face to face interactions dwindle, employees in your country are a luxury not a necessity. To Be Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »