About Me

Name: Young Republican
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Dead Man Talking

                       WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 17:  Newly elected House Republican leadership members, (L-R) Eric Cantor (R-OH), Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX), Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI), current House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL), Rep. John Carter (R-TX) and Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO) pause after singing happy birthday to Rep. Boehner during a news conference after the House Republican Conference elected its new leadership for the 110th Congress on Capitol Hill November 17, 2006 in Washington, DC.  House Republicans elected John Boehner (R-OH) as Minority Leader, Roy Blunt (R-MO) as Minority Whip, Adam Putnam (R-FL) as Conference Chair, Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) as Policy Committee Chair, Kay Granger (R-TX) as Conference Vice Chair, John Carter (R-TX) as Conference Secretary and Tom Cole (R-OK) as NRCC Chairman.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Roy Blunt;Eric Cantor;Thaddeus McCotter;John Boehner;Adam Putnam;John Carter;Kay Granger From Getty Images.
McCain or Obama? Please, that is soooo last election. I'm voting for Obama but if McCain wins a part of me will be very happy. No, the elections I'm following are much more fun, the congressional elections. We have 435 elections in the house and a third of all Senators seats will up for grabs. All this year we have been told Republicans are going to lose big. Then mid-point this year they were going to lose very big. Now, with Bailout-gate every single Republican member (and a few Democrats) are screaming "Run for your political lives!!!" acting like extras in the film "Deep Impact" looking at the wave about to encompass them. Oh, dear.

Wall Street looks strong and put together compared with the fracturing coalitions and down right hostility within the Republican Party. Members calling each other names. Members lying about votes. If there are two men who have the most solid pink slips in America be assured they are John Boehner and Roy Blunt. With what is expected to be huge loses for the party come November and I have said time and time again I expect the house in particular to be the most bloody, Boehner and Blunt are going to be out of job in leadership positions. It's about time. Neither man should have been picked to begin with, the party needs fresh blood with new ideas less concerned about social issues and really focused and the economic and foreign policy of this country.

And be assured of this whoever the next President is, he will have a Democratic Senate and Democratic House for his entire first term. That is an absolute now. And don't think that bodes well for John McCain he's going down with the ship. It was and alwasy will be a mistake for him to tie himself down as a "conservative", he should have been fighting for what he believes truly. Fighting for Roe, gay marriage, ending torture, and off shore oil drilling. He should have been fighting for common sense taxation and aganist more tax cuts for the rich. No hard right conservative voted for him in the primary, but many would still if he had been true to himself a man not conservative as defined by the greatest minds of our generation Limbaugh and Ingraham but perhaps the humble ones like George Will, Barry Goldwater and Gerald Ford.
 
This party and it's members have become the living dead.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Free Markets Aren't Free

                                            
Conservatism has many virtues that I disagree with but none is more essential or generally more agreed upon then that little saying given to us by Ronald Reagan "We want less government". Less... what a funny little word. Republicans have created many more expansions in government, without even getting into social issues but in health care, education and almost every agency except protecting the enivorment.  Then they differ to business. President Bush's legacy to the country is his massive governmental aid to other counteries not in war but in peace. His spending of billions upon billions of dollars in Africa made the United States taxpayer responible not just for ill of their countrymen but also for the entire world.
 
But if there was one legacy Reagan gave us it was that for better or for worse, Republicans believed in free markets. It seems the hard right conservatives at which I'm often at odds with is the only group still left fighting aganist the prospect of $700 billion dollars going to help cherry picked companies who choose risky and bad investments hoping to make a dollar. I may be an Episcopalin, green loving, Obama voter but a part of me will always be a deep follower and believer in Ayn Rand.
 
This bailout is not smaller government, this bailout is not the Republican party, this bailout is not conservative. If this isn't liberalism nothing is. And the fact that a Republican President, Senators and House Members are all going along for the ride shows they do not believe in the free markets, they don't trust them and they're support for businesses instead of the market shows they are liberal wolves in conservative clothing working for a paycheck and not the American voter.
 
Business go out of business. It's why we respect a company like Coca-Cola which has been around since 1886. It takes work to not go out of business and if you put your money in high risk investment you either make it big or go home broke. Wall Street went home broke and then got the government to refund their lost cause.
 
This country has now become a casino, in which nobody loses except those who do not gamble.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Lost Eight

                                
 
Continuning the series about the lost eight senate seats, Republicans will face come November.
 
Alaska- The Ted Stevens Seat- Even with the pick of Alaskan governor Sarah Palin as McCain's VP, the Republican Party in Alaska is in shambles particularly on the national level. With both ethical and criminal charges on both Stevens and Young, Democrats seem posed to finally say enough and throw both of them out. There was hope that a Palin-protege Sean Parnell was going to beat Young in the primary but as of today that looks very doubtful. Everyone is wondering if Stevens will step down and who will be the Republican replacement. Most times though, be it with Mark Foley or Tom Delay, the opposing party wins a seat if the incumbent has an unethical cloud above it's head. With Mark Begich, a good canidate in a very good year expect him to pick up Alaska's Senate seat.
 
Virginia- The John Warner Seat- Out of all the Senate seats, this is the safest flip. Mark Warner is the perfect Virginia Democrat and will beat Jim Gilmore easily come November. With his solid performance and high popularity, he handed Governorship over to Tim Kaine. Many expected the wonderful Tom Davis to go for the seat but he wisely bowed out. Warner will win, the question will be will he help put Virginia in Obama's win catergory.
 
New Mexico- I feel so bad for this state, in the course of one year they have had their Governor try to become President. Their main Senator retire and all three of the congresspeople retire to fight for the retiring Senator's seat. A Heather Wilson-Tom Udall fight would have been interesting but since she lost to the much more unpopular Steve Pearce it seems sure to go to Udall. Both Udall cousins the other one being from Colorado will most likely win but Tom has it much easier. With Republicans bashing Latinos every chance they get they kill themselves in New Mexico with a 42.1% Latino population. That number is actually too low. Many Democrats believe they will be able to pick up Wilson's, Pearce's and Udall's seats leaving the state 3-0 Democrats.
 
North Carolina- The Elizabeth Dole Seat- I actually thought Dole would be able to hold her seat but now I'm predicting a win for Kay Hagan. While everyone talks about how popular Dole is she only won the state with 200,000 votes now she has a six year voting record and the most loyal Bush female Senator. Richard Burr won here 160,000 votes. With a extremely strong African American turnout, (they are 22% of the state) and a strong Democrat in Kay Hagan many conservative white Democrats will vote McCain and then vote Hagan. This state is still competive with the McCain-Obama fight with many expecting a close victory for McCain, the same will be true for Hagan.
 
Mississippi- Bush won the state by 19 pts.! Now many Republican insiders say McCain will win by 4 pts., a 15pt. drop in one of the most conservative states in the country. Again as with the North Carolina race, African American turnout will be crucial and Democrats have chosen a conservative as their candidate. With Ronny Musgrove, a former Governor needing only to get (this is according to Republicans) 4% of McCain supporters to vote for a conservative white Democrat with high name recogination. He should be able to do it and have everyone shocked to see Senator Musgrove (D-MS) on C-SPAN.
 
The Last One- I don't know who will be the last winning seat for the Democrats. The Norm Coleman seat? Gordon Smith? Susan Collins? Mitch McConnell? the now retiring Chuck Hagel's seat? Or even Jim Inhofe?!? Yes the Democrats have the chance according to pollsters to take up to take up to 13 seats. Expecting 5 to remain safe, seems conservative to me. All they need is big Democratic turnout in blue-Obama states to kick Rockfeller Republicans out. Or a state to just turn on one of it's own like with Jim Talent in Missouri. My best guess would be the Inhofe seat (I've got to predict something weird) with a strong conservative Democrat Andrew Rice who is young, good looking and has a great personal story to tell in a conservative Democrat state expect the unexpected with him.
 
I know I could be completly off with my predictions but it's fun to guess anyway. Some seats I want Republicans to keep others I want them to lose but either way I be glued to my computer to watch the numbers come in the congressional and senate races both of which have more power than either McCain or Obama come January.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republicans Will Lose 8 Senate Seats

                                            

 

I know how much the presidential election is everyone's focus but obviously it's important to realize that we'll be electing a new Senate and House as well. Republicans will lose another 24 house seats, if I'm right and eight, yes, eight Senate seats. Let's see the data of the first two seats that will be lost by the Republicans.

The Sure Losers

John Sununu- New Hampshire took a sharp blue turn in 2006. Looking at the 2002 election, in which Sununu beat his returning opponent Jeanne Shaheen by less than 20,000 votes. Kerry beat Bush here by 9,000 votes in 2004. Then in 2006, John Lynch (D) the Governor who won in 2004 by just 14,000 votes won in 2006 with 200,000 votes. An increase of 186,000 votes in just two years. It should be noted that Judd Gregg (R) won easily in 2004 aganist a no money Democrat with over 200,000 votes. Many now believe Gregg will retire as Democrats will certainly finance a strong campaign aganist him in 2010. In 2006, Jeb Bradley(R-1st) lost by 5,000 votes after winning in 2004 with 85,000 votes. His opponent had less than 30% the money aganist him. Charles Bass lost by 14,000 votes after winning just two years earlier with 65,000 votes. All these numbers mean that New Hampshire will go blue come November most likely in the Presiential Race (many liberations will vote Barr or Paul hurting McCain and helping Obama) (Note: I do not think third party candidates matter much but New Hampshire is one state were they do, Nader won the state for Bush in 2000)  but almost certianly in the Senate Race. It's a shame Sununu is a good Senator one whom I endorse.
 
Colorado- The Wayne Allard seat. With Allard retiring Mark Udall and Bob Schaffer have been nominees. Schaffer who lost the Republican primary to Pete Coors who was a  much stronger candidate than Schaffer. Coors then went on to lose to Ken Salazar. Colorado is by no means solid blue, it's one of the most "purple" states out there. Bush won here with 100,000 votes in 2004 but lost 50,000 votes from 2000. Bill Owens (R) who won in 2002 by 400,000 votes gave the governorship over to Bill Ritter (D) who won by 270,000 votes. Even with Republican favored gerrymangering the Democrats have 4 congressman to the Republicans with 3. Many expect Musgrove to lose her seat giving them a 5-2 advantage, the best possible outcome for Democrats in the state.With Udall doing well, he won't win in a landslide but he will win. Allard only won with 51% in 2002 (a high point for Republicans) with a bad candidate which Schaffer is, the Dems have this one.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marine Parenting

First of all even though I am an Obama supporter, I am so excited about Sarah Palin being the VP choice of McCain. She is a brillant wonderful woman who I personally like very much. While I think at the last moments, he should have picked Carly Fiorina, Palin was a far better choice than either Lieberman, Pawlently, and espically Romney. Good job, Senator!

I also have a personal note to mention: I'm an uncle! My sister gave birth to a beautiful  baby boy, named Jake, (actually name Jacob, but Jake is so cool). I love that name. He is as cute as can be.

Now for the acutal post:


For far too long in America we have been told that we can have it all. In the media and culture many people are living their lives with far too much going on. Many people talk about the juggling act, Americans do which leads to the obvious conclusion that if you juggle long a ball will eventually fall. I say all of this with the news of Sarah Palin's daughter being pregnant being in my mind.

My father has been out of the picture for a long time and as the oldest child I have a very, very close relationship with my siblings. I love them so much. I also steped in as the father role, trying to protect them from a world that seeks to harm them far too often. So when my 17 year old sister got pregnant at 16, I took it hard. I took it as I know Sarah Palin did, as a moral failure not on our family members but on ourselves.

Teenagers are teenagers and if you have a perfect one count your blessings. They don't think of the long term consequences and we as parents and/or guardians need to realize it. I told my sister that if she needed any birth control at all I would buy it for her no questions asked no secrets told. She told me she was a virgin. I believed her. She lied. Why? Because kids lie, good kids, bad kids. It's ok because we love them no matter what they do. Often times they want to live up to our expectations and lie to keep an image that isn't true.
 
We as a nation have become lazy in our parenting and I say this not to say that we are lazy but that we don't put our child first. Often times, we put our careers as our primary focus. And we've allowed ourselves to become the "cool parent" instead of just a "parent" and all the negative conantation that implies.
 
We need to get back to traditional parenting, such as forbiding our kids from dating until age 16. And when they do date to make sure it is in a public place, that they are with family at home, and that a chaparone is with them at all times except when in a public place. All old fashioned, all out of date, all sure fire ways to keep your child for becoming pregnant.
 
And if all of this seems like to much, or not possible putting your dating children on birth control is a step every parent should take. Pills are an option but I'm more in favor of the shot that makes you infertile for three months. Now people will say shouldn't I trust my daughter, I know she is good. I trusted my sister, a girl who is one of the sweetest people I know, who I taught Sunday School with for years. No, you can't.
 
We need to take back parenting. In a modern time it's time to turn back to old fashioned dating values and to use modern medicine to make sure we finally end the plague of teenage pregnancy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

2008 Prediction: Liberals Win!

                                                     
 
No matter if Barack Obama or John McCain win, liberalism will be the winner come November. It's worth reminding the limitations of the executive branch which mostly when it comes to making laws remain almost solely with the veto stamp. A President can't make laws he can only sign them into existence. And who makes laws? Yes, congress. And how is congress going to go come November?
 
Democratic and by a landslide. With the Democrats assured at least four Senate seats to make it to 55 without even trying and house members expected to fall by the dozens all of this after a Democratic landslide just two years ago. No, congress will be turning a darker shade of blue as Republicans faces are the only thing left red.
 
In particular expect house races many considered "safe" Republican to become shocking Democratic wins. All of this brings back the presidency. And for those that want to look ahead many expect 2010 to be just as bad with many not expecting a shift in Republican favor until 2012 if that happens at all. We all know Barack Obama will bring liberalism to Washington but what about McCain.
 
While it's worth talking about where he really stands on the issues that's for another time but to get anything done he will have to work with Democrats and always be on the defense. Anyone who knows McCain knows he is "legacy" President consider with how he will be remembered. That isn't a vanity but he wants to make his mark on history.
 
Even the one thing McCain promises the most to conservatives he won't be able to deliever, judges. No Pro-Choice Democrat will vote in favor of another Roberts or Alito no matter what the political cost. It's almost assured that if McCain wins in 08, (which I still think will not happen) a Democrat will win in 12. He may, and I say may make a small mark on federal judges but the Supremes are off limits.
 
McCain can't bring conservative change because A.) He isn't a conservative and doesn't really want to and B.) The Democrats won't let him if he actually tries. Huge amount of Democrats, surviving RINOS and a man who came within a inch of becoming John Kerry's running mate. Oh yeah, this is going to end well. I'm for all of this stuff to happen, and I'm (hint hint) a moderate liberal Republican but it's time conservatives face the music and it is taps.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Last Act Of Charity

                      
 
I cannot help but give advice, it's like I have some "Dear Abby" addiction. Even though I'm voting for Barack Obama, I hate to see John McCain ruin his chances this fall by picking a hideous VP. John McCain should not in any way pick Mitt Romney, who would go down as one of the worst political mistakes since President Clinton thought it wise to spare five minutes with the intern.
 
If you were like me and wonder why so many "Republicans" who said they hoped McCain lost but later came around and started pushing Romney on McCain. The answer is simple they still want McCain to lose and Romney is the sure fire way to do so. Romney, Romney...Romney how I loathe you. I think it's because I realize you are a smart, intellegent man not like some bum hick ala Huckabee. No, you know exactly what you're doing. Lying your way into the White House, which if McCain picked you your styles would at least be consistent.
 
Romney though doesn't play well. His conservative credentials get the blood going in the hard right and who didn't fall in love with him during his offer to deport illegal aliens to one of his mansions. Those lawns aren't going to mow themselves. But really, this election is about the working class white people. And they don't like wealthy people who lay them off. We learned this in Michigan with 06 candidate Dick Devos his lost by a huge margin despite a horrible incumbent, tons of campaign money and a better message.
 
McCain is already going to have money problems, that housing quote made him look old and pathetically rich. It could be the losing statement. Romney would just compound that. And that doesn't get to the real problem with Romney, his Morman faith. I like Mormans and have defending them as a true Christian faith at many of my churches. But what the liberal media (who I now just love...Keith Olberman why do I have you just one hour a day?) who hasn't gone to church since Clinton was elected in 92 to give their praise and thanks doesn't realize that most Christian espically conservative Christians do not only not like Mormanism they view it as a cult. And adding him to the ticket is a sure way to make sure they stay home.
 
McCain can pick Pawnlenty and do no harm but he needs a game changer if he is really going to have a fighting chance come November. He needs to pick either Lieberman or Fiorina. With Colin Powell going to endorse Obama within a month and probably Hagel to, many would say Lieberman but I think that also is a mistake. Again the Christian Right will sit home. No, he needs Fiorina and she'll do it for him. She won't gurantee victory but she gives him the best shot. And that Senator is my last bit of advice to you, now I have to work to defeat you. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Michigan Math

Perhaps it's just me but doesn't every state think that "they" will be the ones to pick the winner. The candidates must focus exclusively on "them" if they are to win, "we are the swing state that will determine it all". Michigan, my state, is not immune. However a closer look will tell you that it's colored blue for a reason.

Often times we look at traditional polling to see which candidate will be the winner. But often the tool used by traditional campaign is to use my term "the flip factor". You have to look at past voting, the actual voters who came out in the last elections and see how many you how many you have to flip to your side, for the incumbent or party of last winner you have to look at the "retain factor".
 
To look even at this, McCain would look to play well in Michigan. John Kerry won here with 51% of the vote but for all purposes I'll be using the actual margin of voters. He won the state with 166,000 voters over President Bush. All McCain would have to do is flip 87,000 and he could win, a task but do able to say the least.
 
                                                                
 
However 2006 data would look to kill that dream. In 2006, Governor Jennifer Granholm (D) beat Dick Devos (R) by 534,000 votes making the flip factor 267,000. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D) beat Mike Bouchard 592,000 making the flip close to 300,000 votes. And having worked on both the Devos and Bouchard campaigns, they were filled with some of the most experienced staff, had excellent ads and a campaign warchest filled to the brim with money.
 
Now is a race for governor, senator or even president four years ago an absolute mark of who will win in the future? No. But it is a strong factor. Many Republicans have hopes that Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's legal problems causing voter problems for Obama. This is doubtful, white voters continue to despise Kilpatrick but fully support and adore others. Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy (D), an African American is considered so strong she faced not one challenge in her bid for re-election. She is prosecuting Kilpatrick.
 
With the Governor due to kick Kilpatrick out of office within 2 weeks, her political stock will soar and she will become an absolute asset to Barack Obama. She is already being used for daily e-mail updates by the campaign. Barack Obama still has to reassure older voters, blue collar workers and the jewish community of him. But many already are. Add to that the passion of his supporters, the lack there of from McCain supporters (the majority of who are voting for him because "he is the lesser of two evils") the huge expected increase in black voters (we are a high minority state) and four more years of young voters getting added to the rolls and four more years of older Bush voters dying, Obama should be fine, should be.
 
Michigan voters went Democratic with an absolutely terrible governor who lost jobs by the dozen in her state. She did so by blaming Republicans and big business. She won huge, Stabenow won huge. Barack Obama should win. I'm not going to predict a margin but come November expect Michigan to turn blue once again.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Economy

                                                      
Middle Class Couple On Couch
Turning 21, a few months ago, told me something I didn't want to hear. I'm becoming an adult and with that comes the challenge that so many of my friends are failing at working and actually getting a self providing job in the middle class. Now I'm still in college and will be for a few more years going to get my degree in Library Science. During that time I work at a mid-western chain of stores called Meijers if you haven't been it's a lot like Wal-Mart but without all the absolute nutty customers. The people I work with, some are college students like me, others in their 30s, 40s getting the same wage as me or less. What is scary about this are a growing number of college gradutes are unable to find jobs and are joining the working poor. The solution is not in some liberal program to make everything all better or some conservative idea to just sit back and let the market figure things out. It's going to come from realizing the changing American economy and focusing education to secure the American middle class.
 
During America's founding in 1776 we were an agricultural society growing and harvesting our food primarily. Then during the Industrial Age we became a manufactoring society, making things in factories. Most of the people during these two peroids are what we call the working poor. Then came the Ford Revolution in which Henry Ford (who I hate personally beyond all words...nazi lover...ok not all words) came upon the brillant policy of making blue collar workers into the middle class. He paid them far more than they were worth in order to make for a huge customer base to buy his product. During all of these times the workplace was of course diverse with it should be mention millions of white collar Americans doing a variety of jobs.
 
Now to America today with the ecomony is trouble but the future very much in peril. The reason for this is simple we have lost our base of middle class jobs. It's important to not make this sound as if we have ten seconds to act before the world blows up but to stop ignoring economic trends and face them head on. Many would say that the new age we are in is the "Technology Age" keeping up this illusion will have dire consequences. Globalization most often takes the blame for the loss of American jobs and to be sure it's a problem (calm down free traders, it does more good than bad) but only a small one. The real problem with the "Technology Age" is technology! The whole point of technology is to erase the need for human work, it is to hand most of the chores over to machines and cut down on the need of productivity. All of which is great if handled well.
 
That is really the whole point of this post, the challenge to Obama or McCain whoever gets elected will be which one can help the American economy adjust to technological advancement. For what a 21 year old college student advice is worth, I believe the solution lies in the Medical and Health fields. The only markets where the customer base is constantly growing, demand constant and human involvement necessary. Of course our workforce will always be diverse but we most focus on making sure my generation will be able to provide as our parents did for us, it's not a political issue...it's an American one, regardless of party.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My "Dear John" Letter

From the start of the election, I've been a strong supporter of John McCain. I admire him, his life and his service both in uniform and in the Senate. He is a good man. You can guess what's next, I've chosen though to support Barack Obama for President. I was actually going to write a blog mocking the whole "Republicans for Obama" idea. After all, John McCain is the most moderate, liberal Republican ever elected to party nomination except perhaps for Gerald Ford. Why leave now? If you're voting for Obama just call yourself a Democrat.
 
During my time defending and supporting John McCain, both in this blog and mostly outside of it, I never really attacked Barack Obama. I told myself I couldn't do another eight years of hating the President after the Clinton saga. So I came to realize that Barack Obama is a good man too. To be clear, I don't agree with him on many issues and to add to that the same is said about John McCain. But I realized after the Obama-Clinton War of 2008 that we would have two good men running to become President, men who would run with honor.
 
                                                                   
 
 
One did. One did for a while, and then changed. When John McCain choose to politicize troop visits and then lie about them, he lost my vote and for what's it's worth because I'm a psycho control freak and will stalk you until you vote the way I want on election day about 2 dozen of my friends and family who are still crazy enough to let me call them my friends and family.
 
John McCain lowered the bar in this election and he didn't have to. By attacking Obama in such a dirty way, he ruined the only thing he had going for him that being the honor that makes John McCain, well, John McCain. He is still a good man without doubt but he made it so one voter who despite being a huge liberal (and yes still a Republican) had the excuse to vote for the other guy.
 
I'm still looking at this election as a win-win. If Barack Obama wins, I'll be happy. If John McCain wins, I'll be happy. Elections are just a choice between two people, I've chosen mine but that doesn't mean we don't have two great men running.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Faith, My Politics

                       

Many on the Christian Right get angry or tired when they hear how many believe religion should be out of politics. It's understandable because as a Christian you realize that your faith is your most important component, it forms you daily and the love we feel from God is so strong we want to follow him the best we can. That's how I feel at least. Whenever I talk with some of my atheist friends, I pity them because I know many things the first being that God exists. I also know how much he loves all of us and the life we lead after accepting God's love is nothing compared to the one before.

My faith is my life. I falter daily, and realize that while I can never get close to Christ's perfection that doesn't mean we don't try daily. With all of my strong feelings, beliefs and knowledge, I also know that America can only survive if we keep religion out of government. The reason for this is simple, every person's view of God is different and in order to allow the free will that God put us on this earth to enjoy and suffer with, free will must remain a component.

As a country that brags about being a beacon of light to the rest of the world for always giving it's citizens the most freedom and allowing them to fight for more, there is no freedom greater than freedom of religion. The right to practice my faith is one I like many others would be willing to die to protect. That right is what makes our country great.

So when some want to implement their faith into government, no matter how well intentioned it must be fought with every fiber of our being. We've seen what's happened when faith enters government in the lands of the Middle East, where rape victims are stoned by their fathers and brothers and where twisted ideology spews hatred in members of Westboro Baptist. We've also seen many more examples of the love a community has and how much good churches do daily across the country from my church to I suspect yours.

I want every one to know the love of Christ and to follow him daily, but it must be their choice neither mine nor the government. It is not the job of government to legislate immorality but protect the freedom to commit it as long as it does not infringe of the right's of other citizens. To this we can become a great Judean/Christian country by choice not by force and let faith be real not false.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Review: Barbara Bush- A Memoir

                       
I only have a few memories of Barbara Bush all of them good but it is funny how someone who so once dominated the headlines can disappear with nary a word later in life. Having found the time to read her memoir, it was a fun experience to step into the Bush 41 White House for a few days and meet a real terrific woman.

Barbara Bush: A Memoir is one of the best edited political autobiographies, avoid the usually pratfalls that doom many a reader. One always it seems starts page 1 hearing about how some famous person was born in a barn and how doing farm chores made them a better Senator. At that point, it becomes a better sleep aid than Advil PM. One suspects, Bush also one wanted to write about her childhood and young girlhood at length but the editor knew better. Her early life before meeting George Bush covers only 25 pages in a 532 page book. In it we learn everything we want and nothing we don't.

One suspects that Barbara Bush's memoir would be better than the former President himself (as he has never written one). He would have wanted to point out the political implications of this and the ramifications of that and overall it wouldn't have stood out some 13 years later. With the first lady's perspective you get to the social side of important meetings and conferences and realize the art to all these things. Of course President Bush had a very busy life from Special Envoy to China, Congressman, CIA Director, VP and President not to mention oil man. All of which let's us the reader meet some fascinating people who we only read about in history books.

Barbara Bush kids about her writing style and indeed she repeats some words more times than I care to count. Her tone is one of unrelenting politeness but you do get that famous "Barbara-chill" effect in certain passages. It's clear that like many children born into wealth she has no idea what it's like to struggle or suffer in terms of finances. And her most controversial statement in the book was when she criticizes a husband of an Army reservist who tells about how his family is suffering with the loss of income from his wife's regular job, in which she says she was offended over the statement because "they knew what they were getting into when they signed up". That may be true but I'd like to see Mrs. Bush's reaction in the former President was called up and she had to survive and a reservist pay. I don't say that with anger but her worldview in terms of economics is sheltered but not malicious.

We learn interesting things about her and the President and their views on certain issues. Such as the fact that she confirms that she is pro-choice (though conservative pro-choice) and for certain forms of gun control. She also confirms that the 92 convention was a disaster and that she and the President were very disturbed about the gay bashing that took place writing "It didn't represent George's views at all".

Her biggest flaw is the most common in political autobiographies especially female ones and that is the constant name dropping. It's not to inflate one self like so many do but instead to cover the party circuit and not make any waves in certain circles. Really though it's the fact that many women are taught from age 5 to always do their thank you notes. Overall the memoir is fun, enjoyable and informative. The best thing to be said for it is it's editing which makes the heavy book faster paced than one expects. *** Out of ****.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yeah, The Oscars Got It Wrong

I've been meaning to post this but debated back and fourth about whether or not it was right on a political blog but part of the fun of blogging is get to know the blogger's personal taste and such. I've said before that I love going to the annual Oscar bash held in Southeastern Michigan. I have a blast, the food is great and it's always nice to meet new  people. I've been going with a friend of mine for years and every year it just get's better. So I written a few words on the five nominated even though the Oscars were like four months ago but whatever now all the films are out of DVD so go the store for your fav.
 
 5th place- Juno- Really enjoyable with wit and attitude that never seem in short supply. However the film never adds up to the greatness so many have attributed to it. It is simply a very good teen movie but not even the best of this decade in the genre. That would belong to "Mean Girls" and "Charlie Barlett" (which just came out on DVD).
 
 4th place- No Country for Old Men- A story about a border town, a suitcase of money, and what it means to be a man and survive. An constantly thrilling ride but it is not profound. A really good rollar coaster is still just a rollar coaster.
 
 3rd place Atonement- The movie that was suppose to win best picture but after people saw it said "not so much". It really is beautifully shot with excellent performances but it is cliched in terms of plot and brings nothing new to the screen.
 
 2nd place- Michael Clayton- The annual liberal picture of the year was one of the best. Evil companies + George Clooney = Oscars? However while excellent, the actual charchter of Clayton is wrongly written, he's the guy with all the answers but we as the audience know before him. Taldia Swenton is superb as the villan (and yes I called the Oscar for her.)
 
  1st place and true best picture winner- There Will Be Blood- We have seen nothing like this picture, this intensity, the Day-Lewis. He demands our attetion of the screen and we gladly give it. Actually knowing someone with Daniel's (the charchter's name not the actor) personality it showed a different type of man. Crazy but honorable in a crazy way. But the film really deserved the Oscar for the scenes between Eli (his foe in the film) and Daniel are so personal, funny and sad all at the same time all the way to the end with the immoratal words "I'm Done" you realize what you are seeing is a classic.
 
For all those who think the conservative critic won out in this selection, I'm afraid I have to add that my favorite film of 2007 was not nominated "Avenue Montiage" a french film with a lot of heart was the best of the bunch but do rent "There Will Be Blood".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attack Pakistan And Chew Gum

My grandfather, the other one for long time readers, a die-hard FOX News addicted Republican, came from Florida to visit my family. When he was coming up our driveway, he picked up the family paper. Then he made the mistake of actually seeing which paper it was, "The New York Times" or as we call it in my sister and I call it "The Jew York Times". (Yes we are allowed to say it we look so perfectly Jewish so that has to count.) Anywho, my grandfather threw a temper tantrum and told me how my evil reading habits were ruining America and that I was wrong for supporting quote "that wicked paper". At that point, I went to work an hour and a half early and escaped to the breakroom, hoping for safety. I now know how every teenage boy must feel when his mother finds "Playboy" under his bed. I didn't have the heart to tell my grandfather I actually read the paper for the articles. The reason I subscribe to The Times is for it's foreign affairs coverage which are better than any other American new source. You are lucky if you get half a paragraph on the side bar on page 9A of your local paper about the evil's of Mugabe. In The Times you get an actual idea of what's going on and the implications it has for the world.
                                                               

Which brings me to the point of how angry I am at the current situation in Pakistan. Yesterday, 9 of our soliders were killed by the Taliban alongside the Afghanistan border. The enemies' base camp location? Pakistan. On the front page, side by side, The New York Times, had to articles to showcase the mockery of our anti-terrorism campaign in Pakistan.

You see, the Taliban have unfettered power, in the Ziarat region of Pakistan. Not only that but they have their own prisons, court system, oversight over the Marble industry, and collect taxes. Yes they are actually the tax collectors. When two Times reporters were held by the Taliban and then released, Pakistan then asked the reporters questions but not one of them pretain to the Taliban, their location, descriptions. It was apparently all old news.
To state the obvious, two organizations attacked us on 9/11 and only two. Al-Qaeda and the their major funders and protectors the Taliban. We have been told time and time again, that our enemies were hiding in caves cowering and broken. But now as the stories in The New York Times, illustrate they are actually running proviences in Pakistan. This isn't a missing person case, they are out in the open. The Times reporters kept running into one member of the taliban after another.
 
Why aren't we, America, with the greatest military in the world not killing those who killed us? It doesn't make sense. I support the Iraq War, the War In Afghanistan, and anything else that attacks the Islamic world but why aren't we killing those who actually enaged our response in the middle east. Our leaders, including President Bush need to answer to us these questions. Or even better, just kill them and let that be the answer. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Demon's Demise

In the constant book of history another page was turned when Jesse Helms died last week. And while I find no joy in his death, I also find no joy in his life. And a part of me is glad he can hate no more.
 
Whenever a big name in the political world passes on, the belt way lies through it's teeth and always fake praises the person giving them the term I described in one of my classes as "sainthood after death". Helms has been getting a little of it, with praise for his work as Chairman of the foreign realtions committee and his push for Africa AIDS research. But really he was a disgusting man.
 
His only accomplishment was that he found yet another group to hate. His bigotry knew no bounds. From his anti-semitism, racism, anti-female, twisted view of abortion, and of course his homophobia, the real question is Washington was who is Jesse going to hate next?
 
                                                 
 
His life is one of tragedy, a man who could feel good only when tearing others down. For every Helms out there, society has failed and allowed a monster to be created. To be sure he was good on taxes and supported a strong military but so do the vast majority of other Republicans. No, Jesse Helms wanted to be known as the Senator without a heart, and he will go down as such.
 
How does one get so twisted, so full of hate, and just plain meaness. Alot of the blame must go Senator Helm's parents who I'm sure raised their child to be such a revolting human being. Under certain circumstances any of us could have been him. But in every human, there is the ability to love and understand. Humanity and compassion can never die and we must bring it out at those times when we least want to.
 
Goodbye, Senator Helms. You can hurt no more.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789Next »